Writ appeal dismissed for default. The appellant failed to appear on the day of judgment when the matter was listed for dismissal, nor did they appear on a subsequent date to seek accommodation. The appeal is dismissed with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.1381 OF 2012
DATED:16.11.2012
Between: Mohammed Ameen Kachi … Appellant And The District Collector Adilabad District At Adilabad and others … Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.1381 OF 2012
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
On 14.11.2012 when the case was called, none appeared for the appellant. Hence, the appeal was directed to be listed ‘for dismissal’. Today also, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none appeared for the appellant nor any accommodation is sought for.
Hence, the writ appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J 16.11.2012
bnr
Mohammed Ameen Kachi
The District Collector Adilabad District and others
PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
