The High Court permitted the appellant to withdraw the writ appeal. The appeal was dismissed with the permission granted for withdrawal. No costs were awarded.
Permission was accorded to withdraw the writ appeal. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
W.A. NO. 1384 OF 2011
Date of Judgment: 21.8.2012
Between:
M.A. Wadood
…Appellant
and
The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad
..Respondent
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
W.A. NO. 1384 OF 2011
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose, ACJ)
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the writ appeal. Permission is accorded.
The writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
___________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
Dt. 21.8.2012 KR
M.A. Wadood
The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
