Appellant sought permission to withdraw the writ appeal, which was granted. Consequently, the writ appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT APPEAL NO.1027 OF 2012
DATED:22.8.2012
Between: Jadav Pooja And
… Appellant
The State Government of A.P., represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Social Welfare Department, Hyderabad and others.
…. Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT APPEAL No.1027 of 2012
Judgment: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ appeal.
Permission accorded.
The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No
costs.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J
22-8-2012
pnb
Jadav Pooja
State Government of A.P.
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
