Constitution Bench order dismissing a Public Interest Litigation withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Permission to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation with liberty to file a fresh petition is granted; PIL dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Public Interest Litigation No.392 of 2012
DATED:17.12.2012
Between: P. Dayakar And The Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Hyderabad and others.,
… Petitioner
…. Respondents
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Public Interest Litigation No.392 of 2012
Order: (per the Hon’ble Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation with liberty to file a fresh petition.
While granting such liberty, the Public Interest Litigation is dismissed as withdrawn.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, HCJ
______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J
17.12.2012
pnb
P. Dayakar
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
