The Acting Chief Justice granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw Public Interest Litigation P.I.L. No. 389 of 2012 with liberty to apply afresh.
Permission to withdraw the public interest litigation with liberty to apply afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
P.I.L. NO. 389 of 2012
DATED: 03.12.2012
Between:
All India Forward Block Pary (Regd.), A.P., State, Rep. by its Secretary Mr. Muralidhar Rao, Hyderabad.
… Petitioner
And
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat Building, Saifabad, Hyderabad & Others.
… Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
P.I.L. No. 389 of 2012
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the public interest litigation with liberty to apply afresh.
Permission is granted.
The public interest litigation is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to apply afresh. No costs.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J 03.12.2012 kv
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI
CHANDRA GHOSE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
PIL NO. 389 OF 2012
___________________________________________________ (Order of the Division Bench delivered by the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
03.12.2012
kv
All India Forward Block Pary (Regd.)
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V Afzulkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
