Single-paragraph common order granting permission to petitioners to withdraw these Public Interest Litigation petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions and dismissing them as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION Nos. 285, 286, 287 and 288 of 2012
DATED:3.9.2012
Between: C.J. Karira and others. … Petitioners And The State of A.P., Represented by its Chief Secretary, Hyderabad and others.
…. Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION Nos. 285, 286, 287 and 288 of 2012
Common Order: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose)
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw these petitions with liberty to file fresh petitions.
While granting such liberty, the Public Interest Litigations are dismissed as withdrawn.
__________________________ PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, ACJ
______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR,J 3-9-2012
pnb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether PILs involving C.J. Karira and others should be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions.
C.J. Karira and others
The State of A.P.
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
