2. The petitioners herein are accused in S.C.No.132 of 2007. In pursuance of the petition filed by one of the petitioners, police also registered a case as a counter case. Some of the petitioners also sustained injuries allegedly at the hands of the accused in another case. Therefore, in a case and counter case, unless the documents in other case are brought on record, the Court cannot look into those documents. Therefore, it is not a new plea taken so as to fill up the lacuna in the case of defence because from the beginning, it is the case of the petitioners that they also sustained some injuries at the hands of the some of the prosecution witnesses and they lodged FIR with the Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, Peddamandyam P.S. They have to be marked through concerned authorities. Therefore, the trial Court is directed to fix a date for summoning those documents and the petitioners are at liberty to substitute those documents with certified copies and mark them in the case through the witnesses P.W.24-Doctor and P.W.28-A.S.I. after examination of the above two witnesses. The trial Court is further directed to dispose of the case in accordance with law within one month from the date of examination of P.Ws. 24 and 28.
