Criminal Petition dismissed because the petitioner failed to appear and did not provide any representation on the date of hearing, resulting in a default dismissal order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3524 OF 2009
Between :
Syed Afsaruddin @ Afsar ... PETITIONER
A N D
The State of A.P. …RESPONDENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3524 OF 2009
ORDER:
When the matter had come up on 10.02.2012, none appeared for the petitioner, and therefore, the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matter has come up, none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation on his behalf.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for default.
K.C.BHANU, J
FEBRUARY 14, 2012 YVL
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
14.02.2012
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3524 OF 2009
YVL
Syed Afsaruddin @ Afsar
The State of A.P.
K.C. BHANU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
