Allowed

Nagaraju Bhaskar. B v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC12 Oct 2012CRLRC/1952/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal revision case, the High Court allowed the release of the impugned crime vehicle (an Auto) to the petitioner for interim custody. The release was conditional upon the petitioner executing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with a surety, producing the RC book, and undertaking not to alienate or damage the vehicle until the main case concludes.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Case allowed; vehicle released to petitioner for interim custody subject to bond and conditions.

Nagaraju Bhaskar. B Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2012)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1952 OF 2012

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

Petitioner filed this Criminal Revision Case by invoking the provision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code being aggrieved by the docket order dated 29.09.2012 passed in C.F.R.No.5756 of 2012 in COR No.421 of 2012-13, by the Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for Prohibition and Excise Cases, Warangal.

¶4

Heard.

¶5

Petitioner herein filed the impugned application seeking to release the crime vehicle i.e. Auto bearing Regn. No.AP-36-W-2566. The said application was returned by the learned Magistrate vide impugned order. Challenging the same, the present revision is filed. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not an accused and he is the owner of the vehicle and he is eking out his livelihood by plying the said vehicle and that if the vehicle is kept idle for a long period there is every possibility of getting it damaged. He also submitted that the petitioner is ready to produce the vehicle as and when required by the Court.

¶6

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor also submitted that interim custody of the crime vehicle can be granted to the petitioner by imposing certain conditions.

¶7

Considering the above circumstances, it is directed that the vehicle viz., Auto bearing Regn. No.AP-36-W-2566, shall be released for interim custody of the petitioner, subject to final orders to be passed at the time of disposal of the main case, on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court/authority concerned and also on production of RC book. It is further directed that the petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle, shall not change the

¶8

physical features of the same till the disposal of the criminal case and further he shall undertake to produce the vehicle as and when required by the Court/authority concerned. This order does not stand in the way of any proceedings/investigation by the competent authority.

¶9

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed.

¶10

Miscellaneous petitions pending in this revision, if any, shall

¶11

stand closed.

¶12

______________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶13

Date : 12.10.2012 Nn

¶14

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶15

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1952 OF 2012

¶16

DATED 12^th October, 2012.

¶17

Nagaraju Bhaskar. B v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagaraju Bhaskar. B v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lanka Sanyasi Rao, Vs State of A.P.

Dunthuluri Venkateswar Rao, Vs Gangapatilla Murali

Kota Venkata Rama Rao, (A-4), Vs Kota Lakshmi Tulasi , Tulasamma

Chinthala Ravi Vs The State of a.P., through Sho.

Kanamala Kiran Kumar Vs The State of A.P.

Ramdas, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh