Allowed

Chinthala Ravi v. The State of a.P., through Sho.

Telangana HC12 Oct 2012CRLRC/1934/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal revision concerning the release of a seized crime vehicle, this single-bench order granted interim custody to the petitioner subject to execution of a personal bond with a surety and conditions prohibiting alienation or tampering with the vehicle.

What did the court decide?

Interim release of the impugned vehicle (TVS XL SUPER) to the petitioner upon execution of a personal bond of Rs.20,000 with one surety and undertaking of conditions.

Chinthala Ravi Vs The State of a.P., through Sho. — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2012)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1934 OF 2012

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

Petitioner filed this Criminal Revision Case by invoking the provision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code being aggrieved by the docket order dated 7.8.2012 passed in C.F.R.No.2167 of 2012 in P.R.No.511 of 2012-13 by the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Huzurnagar.

¶4

Heard.

¶5

Petitioner herein filed the impugned application seeking to release the crime vehicle i.e. TVS XL SUPER without registration number, Chassis No.MD 621BD 14 CIC 84876, Engine No.ODICC 1926838 and the said application was returned by the learned Magistrate vide impugned order. Challenging the same, the present revision is filed.

¶6

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle and if the vehicle is kept idle for a long period there is every possibility of getting it damaged. He also submitted that the petitioner is ready to produce the vehicle as and when required by the Court.

¶7

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor also submitted that interim custody of the crime vehicle can be granted to the petitioner by imposing certain conditions.

¶8

Considering these circumstances, it is directed that vehicle i.e. TVS XL SUPER without registration number, Chassis No.MD 621BD 14 CIC 84876, Engine No.ODICC 1926838 shall be released for interim custody of the petitioner, subject to final orders to be passed at the time of disposal of the main case, on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court/authority concerned. It is further directed that the petitioner shall not alienate the

¶9

vehicle, shall not change the physical features of the same till the disposal of the criminal case and further he shall undertake to produce the vehicle as and when required by the Court/authority concerned. This order does not stand in the way of any proceedings/investigation by the competent authority.

¶10

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed.

¶11

Miscellaneous petitions pending in this revision, if any, shall stand closed.

¶12

______________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶13

Date : 12.10.2012 Nn

¶14

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

¶15

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1934 OF 2012

¶16

DATED 12^th October, 2012.

¶17

Chinthala Ravi v. The State of a.P., through Sho.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chinthala Ravi v. The State of a.P., through Sho.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lanka Sanyasi Rao, Vs State of A.P.

Dunthuluri Venkateswar Rao, Vs Gangapatilla Murali

Kota Venkata Rama Rao, (A-4), Vs Kota Lakshmi Tulasi , Tulasamma

Kanamala Kiran Kumar Vs The State of A.P.

Ramdas, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Nagaraju Bhaskar. B Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh