This is a brief order where the Criminal Appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to appear on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWELVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.345 of 2004
Between: M/s.Sudarsan Chemical Industries Limited, Guntur, rep.by its Administrative Manager L.Krishna Kumar
..... APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT
And B.Srinivasa Rao and another
.....RESPONDENTS
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.345 of 2004
JUDGMENT:
When the matter is taken up for hearing on 15.02.2012 none appeared for the appellant, and hence it is directed to be listed today
under caption “for dismissal”. Even today also, when the matter is called, none appeared for the appellant.
Therefore, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed.
____________________________ N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO,J
Dated: 22.02.2012 Dsr
M/s.Sudarsan Chemical Industries Limited
B.Srinivasa Rao
N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
