The civil miscellaneous appeal was dismissed for nonprosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the listed dates without representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPARAO
C.M.A. NO. 1419 OF 2002
Between:
Bathula Anandam S/o Laxmaiah
………….Appellant
AND
Bathula Uma Devi W/o Anandam
………….Respondent
JUDGMENT : (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed)
When the matter was called on 12.03.2012 none appeared for the appellant and there was no representation on his behalf. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Even today when the matter is called none appears for the appellant and there is no representation on his behalf. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J
____________________ K.S. APPARAO, J
DATE: 13.03.2012 KA
... REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SECTION OFFICER
To
1. 2 CD copies.
Bathula Anandam
Bathula Uma Devi
GHULAM MOHAMMED
K.S. APPARAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
