M. Sreenivasulu naidu v. The La Officer Cum Revenue Divisional Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE SRI…
SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE SRI…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPARAO
A.S. NO. 392 OF 2002
Between:
M. Seenivasulu Naidu and seven others
………….Appellants
AND
The Land Acquisition Officer cum Revenue Divisional Officer and two others
………….Respondents
JUDGMENT : (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed)
When the matter was called on 07.03.2012 none appeared for the appellants and there was no representation on their behalf. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Even today when the matter is called none appears for the appellants and there is no representation on their behalf. Hence, this Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________ GHULAM MOHAMMED, J
____________________ K.S. APPARAO, J
DATE: 12.03.2012 KA
... REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SECTION OFFICER
To
1. 2 CD copies.
M. Seenivasulu Naidu and seven others
The Land Acquisition Officer cum Revenue Divisional Officer and two others
GHULAM MOHAMMED
K.S. APPARAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court