The court closed a contempt case (C.No.473 of 2009) upon learning that a prior order regarding compensation demarcation was complied with, deeming no further enquiry necessary.
The contempt case was closed. No further enquiry is necessary. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD
PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:473 OF 2009
DATED:10.02.2012
BETWEEN:
POTHAPI NARASIMHULU & OTHERS
…PETITIONERS
AND
SRI CHAKRAPANI, IAS & OTHERS
…RESPONDENTS.
THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:473 OF 2009
ORDER:
The learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition on instructions stated that in compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No:5602 of 2008, the petitioners have been paid the re determined compensation.
Hence, no further enquiry is necessary.
Accordingly, contempt case is closed. No costs.
_______________ Justice G.Rohini.
Date:10.2.2012 Gurc. THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:473 OF 2009
DATED:10.2.2012
POTHAPI NARASIMHULU & OTHERS
SRI CHAKRAPANI, IAS & OTHERS
G.ROHINI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
