The petitioner represented that substantial amounts were paid complying with a prior W.P. order. The Court held no further enquiry was necessary and closed the contempt case ex parte.
Contempt case closed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: HYDERABAD
PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:1555 OF 2009
DATED:13.02.2012
BETWEEN:
POLISETTY RADHA KRISHNA
…PETITIONER
AND
K.KUMARASWAMY & OTHERS
…RESPONDENTS.
THIS COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:1555 OF 2009
ORDER:
It is represented that substantial amounts have already been paid to the petitioner in compliance with the order of this Court in W.P.No:13404 of 2009.
Hence, no further enquiry is necessary and the contempt case is accordingly closed.
No costs.
_______________ Justice G.Rohini.
Date:13.2.2012 Gurc. THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:1555 OF 2009
DATED:13.2.2012
POLISETTY RADHA KRISHNA
K.KUMARASWAMY & OTHERS
G.Rohini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
