During hearing of a writ petition challenging a revenue order, the High Court granted one week to the respondents to file a counter-affidavit and listed the matter for final hearing on 3-03-2011.
One week time granted to respondents to file counter-affidavit; subsequent appearance directed on 3-03-2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY , THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN :PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WP .NO:5250 of 2007
Between: Chintakindi Laxmamma, W/o. Late Chintakindi Mallaiah,
..... Petitioner
AND
.....Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the Memo No.C/5249/05 dated 04.11.2006 issued by the 2nd respondent is illegal, arbitrary and against principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same;
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI MOHD.GULAM RASOOL Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Govt. Pleader for Revenue for respondents, the Court made the following:
ORDER: “ Finally, one week time is granted to the respondents to file counter, failing which the respondents have to appear in person on 3-03-2011, with relevant record, and defend the case. List the matter on 3-03-2011.”
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1 The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally Road, Hyderabad. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Division, Hyderabad. 3 The Deputy Director, Survey and Land Records, Nampally, Hyderabad. ( 1 to 3 BY SPL. MESSENGER) 4.2 CCs to the G.P. for Revenue, High court of A.P.Hyd. (BY SPL. MESSENGER) 5.One C.C.to Sri Mohd. Ghulam Rasool Advocate (OPUC) 6.one spare copy. Bsr
HIGH COURT
NVR.J
DATED 24-02-2011
LIST THE MATTER ON 3-03-2011
ORDER
W.P.NO. 5250 OF 2007
DIRECTION
Bsr Dt. 26-2-2011
HIGH COURT
NVR.J
DATED 24-02-2011
LIST THE MATTER ON 3-03-2011
ORDER
W.P.NO. 5250 OF 2007
DIRECTION
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to set aside the impugned Memo No.C/5249/05.
Whether the High Court should issue any relief in the petition.
Chintakindi Laxmamma
The District Collector, Hyderabad District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Division
The Deputy Director, Survey and Land Records
N. V. Ramana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
