A writ petition challenging the allotment of a stall to another bidder as illegal and arbitrary was disposed of as the claim was considered during its pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
Writ Petition No.27929 of 2009
Date: December 16, 2011
Between:
S. Sreenivasulu, S/o.Ramaiah, Aged 35 years, Door No.11-1-688, Krupanandam Nagar, Anantapur, Anantapur District
… Petitioner
And
Regional Manager, APSRTC, Anantapur, Anantapur District and others
Order:
This writ petition is filed seeking mandamus declaring the action of the respondents-APSRTC in not
allotting stall No.24,
‘O’ Space Water Kiosk, Anantapur Depot, Anantapur District to the petitioner in spite of the fact that he was the highest bidder, as illegal and arbitrary
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that, during the pendency of the writ petition, the claim of the petitioner has been considered and therefore no further orders are necessary.
Recording the aforesaid statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
______________________ (R. SUBHASH REDDY, J)
December 16, 2011 MRR
S. Sreenivasulu
Regional Manager, APSRTC, Anantapur
R. Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
