Criminal Revision Case dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear on the appointed dates without representation, evincing no interest in prosecuting the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
CRL.R.C.No.591 OF 2005
Date:01-04-2011
Between:-
Sannapureddy Hanuma Reddy
.. Petitioner/Accused
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
.. Respondent
ORDER:-
When the matter had come up on 25-03-2011, none appeared for the petitioner and there was no representation on his behalf, and so, it was posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, when the matter has come up for hearing, none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation on his behalf. Therefore, the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting his case.
The Criminal Revision Case is, accordingly, dismissed for
default.
___________ B.N.RAO NALLA, J
1st April, 2011 AMD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
CRL.R.C.No.591 OF 2005
Date:01-04-2011
AMD
Sannapureddy Hanuma Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
B.N.Rao Nalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
