The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a Criminal Revision Case filed by G.Shankar for default due to non-appearance and lack of representation on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
CRL.R.C.No.430 OF 2005
Date:01-04-2011
Between:G.Shankar .. Petitioner/Appellant/Accused And K.Srinivas and another .. Respondents
ORDER:-
When the matter had come up on 24-03-2011, none appeared for the petitioner and there was no representation on his behalf, and so, it was posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, when the matter has come up for hearing, none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation on his behalf. Therefore, the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting his case.
The Criminal Revision Case is, accordingly, dismissed for default.
___________ B.N.RAO NALLA, J
1st April, 2011
AMD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N.RAO NALLA
CRL.R.C.No.430 OF 2005
Date:01-04-2011
AMD
G.Shankar
K.Srinivas
B.N.Rao Nalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
