A single judge dismissed the criminal revision petition holding that the condition of depositing Rs. 50,000 for interim custody of an auto-rickshaw was not onerous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2076 of 2011
ORDER:
After perusal of the order of the lower Court and hearing the counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that imposition of condition of deposit of cash of Rs.50,000/- for interim custody of the auto-rickshaw, is not in any way onerous.
2. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Petition is
dismissed.
______________________________ JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
Dt:14.10.2011 ysk
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2076 of 2011
Dt:14.10.2011
ysk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condition of deposit of Rs. 50,000 cash for interim custody of auto-rickshaw is onerous.
Petitioner
Respondent
Samudrala Govindaraju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
