so. Further, there are allegations of abuses and threats against all the accused. It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that there is civil disputes between the parties with regard to the properties left by Bommidi Ruthamma @ Chittemma and that civil suit in O.S. No.15 of 2008 is pending before Principal Junior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram in that regard. The civil suit is only in respect of landed property and not the house property which is the subject matter herein. It is contended that the allegation against the petitioners 1 and 2 are not true and that since A-1 is an Advocate at Bhimavaram, criminal case was foisted to defame him. This is not a case of personal rivalry between the parties indulging in defaming an advocate. It is a case relating to claim of the property. If there is any claim for the house property in question which is in possession of the defacto-complainant, legal steps should have been taken by the concerned to file civil suit for possession of the said house. The alleged high handed act of trespass and grabbing the property in the presence of and at the instigation of the Advocate like A-1 should not have occurred. I am of the opinion that it is a matter for evidence which has to be decided after recording evidence of both the parties during trial by the Magistrate. I do not find any valid reasons to quash the proceedings in the criminal case. 2) Hence, the petition is dismissed.
