The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a Criminal Petition as the petitioner's counsel was absent and there was no representation, indicating the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8069 of 2009
DATE: 13.10.2011
Between:
T.Purushotham
…… Petitioner And
The State of A.P, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P
…..Respondent
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
CRIMINAL PETITION No.8069 of 2009
ORDER :
The petitioner’s counsel is absent both during before lunch session and after lunch session. There is no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not
interested to pursue this petition.
2) Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
_______________________________ SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU, J
October 13, 2011 ksh
T.Purushotham
The State of A.P
SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
