T.Hanmandlu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal petition quashing proceedings was dismissed as infructuous because investigation was completed and a charge sheet had already been filed against the petitioner.
Criminal petition quashing proceedings was dismissed as infructuous because investigation was completed and a charge sheet had already been filed against the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No.5970 OF 2010
ORDER:
The petitioner approaches this Court with a prayer to quash the proceedings initiated against him in Crime No. 107 of 2010 on the file of the Station House Officer, Devanpally Police Station, Nizamabad District, wherein the petitioner was arrayed as Accused No.8 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 120-B, 121(A), 307, 347, 386, 506, 107, 115 read with 109, 114 and 149 of I.P.C. and 25 of Arms Act.
At the hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation has already been completed and charge sheet is also filed in the case.
In view of the fact that the investigation is already completed and charge sheet has also been filed in the case, the criminal petition has become infructuous.
The Criminal Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved over filing of the charge sheet, he is at liberty to challenge the same in appropriate proceedings by invoking appropriate provision.
________________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
Dated : 20th October, 2011
pnb
2 provisions across 2 enactments
The Petitioner
State
RAJA ELANGO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court