Dismissed
B.Daniel v. Sri Kruopanandam
Telangana HCCC/711/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
C.C. No.711 of 2003
Between:
B.Daniel … Petitioner and Sri B.Krupanandam and another … Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
C.C. No.711 of 2003
ORDER:
The learned counsel, representing Sri V.Jagapathi, learned counsel for the petitioner on record, represents that the subject matter of this contempt case has been infructuous. Therefore, this case may be dismissed as infructuous.
Recording the said submission, this contempt case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________ JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
Date: 19.07.2011 LSK
B.Daniel
Sri B.Krupanandam
G.CHANDRAIAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court