M. Mutyala Rao v. Sri Suresh Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt case where the petitioner did not appear. The respondent's presence was dispensed with until further orders. The High Court postponed the case to be heard on 26.08.2011, and no substantive order on merits was delivered.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT HYDERABAD
(ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND ELEVEN : PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE: L. NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 344 of 2011.
Between:
Neelopher W/o Mohd. Zameer Ahmed
Petitioner
AND
Mohd. Zameer Ahmed S/o Mohd. Saleem Ahmed, R/o H. No. 4-7-10/21/C, Plot No. 2, Raghavendra Nagar, Nacharam, Hyderabad
. Respondent
Whereas the Contempt Case filed under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, R/w. Article 215 of the Constitution of India praying the High Court to hold the respondent as guilty of willful and deliberate contempt, for violating the order of injunction passed by this Hon’ble Court in CRP.MP. No. 4546 of 2010 in CRP. No. 3408 of 2010 on 03-08-2010 and it is further consequentially prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to punish the respondent/contemptnor in accordance with law;
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Neelopher W/o Mohd. Zameer Ahmed
- respondent
Mohd. Zameer Ahmed S/o Mohd. Saleem Ahmed
Coram
L. Narasima Reddy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/34/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court