Held the writ petition filed challenging applicability of Prize Chits Act and seeking non-interference in business was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
The writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders dissolved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBURARY, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 9398 of 2007
Between:
M/s. Bodedla Technologies & Marketing (P) Ltd., Having its Regd. Office at 17-85/C/3, 1st floor, Shop No.3, Annapurna Complex, Ex.Chaitanyapuri, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad, Rep. By its Director, Mr. K.V.Subba Rao
..... PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram)
This writ petition is filed to declare that the provisions of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 do not apply to the business pursued by the petitioner and in substance for a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the business of the petitioner.
The learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. P.Vishnu Vardhan Reddy, states that the petitioner does not wish to pursue this writ petition.
As the petitioner herein does not wish to pursue the writ petition, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The interim orders shall stand dissolved. No order as to costs.
____________________ Justice Goda Raghuram
_______________________ Justice Ramesh Ranganathan
February 4, 2010 MAS.
M/s. Bodedla Technologies & Marketing (P) Ltd.
The Respondents
GODA RAGHURAM
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
