Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking regularization and continuation of services. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the claimed relief was to be implemented by the second respondent, not the government.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. SURI APPA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26639 of 2000
Date:26.11.2010
Between:
K.Surya Bai
……….. Petitioner.
And
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Women Development Child Welfare Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.
……. Respondents.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. SURI APPA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26639 of 2000
ORDER:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner filed a writ petition for regularization and for continuation of her services. The relief claimed by the petitioner is implemented by the 2nd respondent-A.P.Women’s Co-operative Finance Corporation.
The writ petition, is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
______________________ JUSTICE V. SURI APPA RAO
Date:26.11.2010 mrb
K.Surya Bai
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
A.P.Women's Co-operative Finance Corporation
V. SURI APPA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
