Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the appellant represented nor was represented on presentation dates.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.510 of 2003
Date: 01-12-2010
Between
Muthinani Papaiah M.Venkata Subba Reddy and another
and
… Appellant/Petitioner
… Respondents/Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.510 of 2003
Judgment:
On the last occasion i.e., on 24-11-2010 none represented for the appellant-petitioner and there was no representation. Even today also, none represented for the appellant-petitioner and there is no representation.
2. The civil miscellaneous appeal is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
___________________________ JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO 01st December, 2010. Ak
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.510 of 2003
01st December, 2010.
Muthinani Papaiah and another
Amar and another
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
