A writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause of action no longer survived.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU
W.P.No. 23945 of 2008
Date: 24-09-2010
Between:
P. Dileep Kumar
……….. Petitioner
and
The Secretary, State Board of Technical Education and Training, and others
………. Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.No. 23945 of 2008
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the cause of
action does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
____________ C.V. RAMULU, J
Date: 24-09-2010 YCR
P. Dileep Kumar
The Secretary, State Board of Technical Education and Training
C.V. RAMULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
