The court addressed two writ petitions concerning the promotion of staff assistants. Finding that promotion orders were issued pursuant to earlier judgments, the court held the current petitions to be infructuous and dismissed them without further orders.
The writ petitions were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO
Writ Petition Nos.15527 and 15574 of 2001
Date: 02-12-2010
W.P.No.15527 of 2001: Between B.Steven Kumar … Petitioner and The General Manager, The Anantapur District Co-op. Central Bank Ltd., Anantapur and another … Respondents W.P.No.15574 of 2001: Between V.Janaki Rami Reddy and 2 others … Petitioners and The General Manager, The Anantapur District Co-op. Central Bank Ltd., Anantapur and another … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO Writ Petition Nos.15527 and 15574 of 2001 Common Order:
None appears for the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the Deputy General Manager, The Anantapur District Coop. Central Bank Limited, Subash Road, Anantapur addressed a letter to him to the effect that the petitioners herein were promoted as V Cadre Staff Assistants in the year 2005 itself in pursuance of the orders of this Court in W.P.M.P.Nos.19450 and 19497 of 2001 in W.P.Nos.15527 and 15574 of 2001, respectively, dated 31-7-2001.
3. In that view of the matter, no orders need be passed in these writ petitions.
4. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
___________________________ JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO
02nd December, 2010. Ak
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SURI APPA RAO
Writ Petition Nos.15527 and 15574 of 2001 (Common Order)
02nd December, 2010.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions remain entitled to be heard after the promotion of petitioners was effected by the respondents pursuant to previous orders.
Whether these writ petitions have become infructuous due to the implementation of the earlier orders.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.MP.Nos.19450 and 19497 of 2001Referred¶6
B. Steven Kumar
V. Janaki Rami Reddy
The General Manager, The Anantapur District Co-op. Central Bank Ltd., Anantapur
V. Suri Appa Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
