The High Court dismissed the writ appeal as infructuous because the underlying writ petition (WP No. 11147 of 1998) was disposed of along with a batch, rendering the challenge to the interim order moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
W.A.NO. 205 OF 2003
Date of Disposal: 23.2.2010
Between:
The Andhra Pradesh Vikalangula Co-Operative Corporation
…Appellant
and
A.P. Prasad Training cum production center, Vijayawada and another
…Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
W.A.NO. 205 OF 2003
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A. Gopal Reddy, J)
This writ appeal is directed against the interim order, dated 4.4.2002 in WPMP No. 1733 of 2002 in WP No. 11147 of 1998. It is represented that WP No. 11147 of 1998 itself has been disposed of along with batch and therefore this writ appeal has become infructuous. Accordingly the writ appeal
is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
_______________________ JUSTICE A. GOPAL REDDY
________________________________ JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Dt.23.2.2010 KR
The Andhra Pradesh Vikalangula Co-Operative Corporation
A.P. Prasad Training cum production center, Vijayawada
and another
A. GOPAL REDDY
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
