Petitioner instructed counsel not to press the tax revision case; the High Court dismissed the case accordingly without costs.
Revision dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THIS THE 26th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010
PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
TAX REVISION CASE No.47 of 2010
BETWEEN:
M/S. Hyderabad Chemical Products Limited
… PETITIONER(S)
AND
State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its State Representative Before Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad
…RESPONDENT(S)
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
TAX REVISION CASE No.47 of 2010
ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice B.Prakash Rao)
Sri S.Dwarakanath, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he was instructed to not press the revision.
Recording the same, the revision case is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
______________________ (B. PRAKASH RAO, J)
_____________________ (R.KANTHA RAO, J)
26th February, 2010 CVRK
M/S. Hyderabad Chemical Products Limited
State of Andhra Pradesh
B. PRAKASH RAO
R. KANTHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
