This order dismisses an appeal for the appellant's non-prosecution, as no party appeared before the court to make representations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY
C.M.S.A.No. 7 OF 2001.
DATED 8TH FEBRUARY, 2010.
BETWEEN
Syed Ali Uddin Quadri
… Appellant an d
The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (Circle No.2) rep. By the Commissioner.
….Respondent.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY
C.M.S.A.No. 7 OF 2001.
ORDER:
The learned Standing Counsel for the respondentCorporation is present.
Even today also, none appeared for the appellant nor any representation is made on her behalf .
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
-------------------------------------------JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY
DATED 8T H FEBRUARY, 2010. Msnr.
Syed Ali Uddin Quadri
The Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (Circle No.2) rep. By the Commissioner.
G.V. SEETHAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
