Proceeding for dismissal was taken on non-prosecution. Appeal case was dismissed as the appellant failed to appear and no representation was made on behalf of the appellant on the day of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY
C.M.S.A.No. 5 OF 2000.
DATED 8TH FEBRUARY, 2010.
BETWEEN
Kanduri Thimmappa
… Appellant
an d
Ashok Kumar Bhandari and ors
….Respondents.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY
C.M.S.A.No. 5 OF 2000.
ORDER:
None appeared for the appellant nor any representation was made on his behalf on the previous occasion i.e. on 1.2.2010. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed to day under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today also, though the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal, none appeared for the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
-------------------------------------------JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY
DATED 8T H FEBRUARY, 2010. Msnr.
Kanduri Thimmappa
Ashok Kumar Bhandari and ors
G.V. Seethapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
