A civil revision petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's non-appearance, resulting in the vacating of an interim suspension granted earlier.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim suspension vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V. SEETHAPATHY
C.R.P. No.3605 of 2000
DATED: 05.02.2010
Between:
Polukuru Narasa Reddy .. Petitioner/J.Dr. And Audireddy Venkateswarulu Reddy .. Respondent/D.Hr.
O R D E R:-
When the matter was called on 01.02.2010, none appeared for the petitioner nor was made any representation on his behalf, as such, the matter was adjourned to this day under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, when the matter was taken up, none appeared for the petitioner nor was made any representation on his behalf.
Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. Consequently, the interim suspension granted by this Court on 07.09.2000 in C.M.P. No.16367 of 2000 shall stand vacated. No order as to costs.
J 5th February, 2010
bcj
Polukuru Narasa Reddy
Audireddy Venkateswarulu Reddy
G.V. Seethapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
