The Tribunal awarded Rs.1,500/- towards transport to Hospital as claimed and as against Rs.10,000/- claimed towards extra nourishment, the Tribunal awarded Rs.5,800/- to disturb which assessment there is no positive material. Similarly, the award of Rs.15,000/- each towards surgery for removal of the plates and the temporary disability cannot be considered to be unjust and the refusal by the Tribunal to grant any compensation towards any continuing permanent disability or loss of earning power in the absence of proof of any such disability or earning power also cannot be faulted. However, it is not known how the Tribunal concluded that the medical bills had come to Rs.14,200/-, while in fact the earlier treatment costed Rs.18,545-07ps to the petitioner and the subsequent surgery costed Rs.8,025/-. Even assuming that the subsequent surgery for removal of plates is covered by Rs.15,000/- awarded by the Tribunal under that head, the medical expenses incurred in C.D.R. Hospitals were obviously not covered. A sum of Rs.4,345/- is not granted in spite of proof of such expenses for no explicable reason. The Tribunal also did not consider the damage to the clothing, the attendant’s charges and other inevitable expenses, which the injured-petitioner would
