It is seen from the affidavit in support of the petition for police aid that neither the date nor the time of attempt for interference by the respondent nor any other details were given and how the alleged attempts for interference were successfully resisted was also not detailed. In any view, the order granting police aid was in force from 07-05-2010 till an ex parte order was passed in this Civil Revision Petition on 09-07-2010 for more than two (2) months without intervention of any interim order from this Court even in this revision, and therefore, the apprehensions or dangers, which led the respondent to seek police aid, must have been possibly averted in the meanwhile. The grant of police aid is not in eternity and only for the purpose of meeting any such threats as conceived by this court in P. Shanker Rao v. B. Susheela. Therefore, irrespective of the absence of any definite material in support of the request for police aid, the continuance of the order granting police aid indefinitely need not be resorted to. However, if it becomes necessary for either party to seek appropriate reliefs in this regard in future during pendency of the suit, it will be always open to them to approach the trial Court with the necessary request, which the trial Court will consider on merits in accordance with law depending on the facts and circumstances probablised before it justifying or not justifying such a request.
