The writ petition was dismissed for default notice because neither the petitioner nor any representative appeared before the court on two hearing dates.
The writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 77 of 2001
ORDER:
When the matter had come up earlier on 12.06.2009, none appeared and there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption ‘ for dismissal’. Even today also, when the matter has come up, none appears and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________ kvrm 19.06.2009
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 77 of 2001
DATED: 19.06.2009
Petitioner
Respondent
P.Swaroop Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
