This order dismisses a writ petition for non-prosecution because the petitioners failed to appear or present representation on the day the matter was called. No order as to costs was passed.
None; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 10063 of 2004
Between:
..... PETITIONERS
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the tender notification No.P-01 to P-15/04-05, dt.23-5-04 issued by the
2nd respondent as illegal and arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.P.GIRI KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent No.: O.MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO)
The Court made the following :
ORDER :
Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for
non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
___________________ R.SUBHASH REDDY, J.
18th June, 2009. skmr
Akula Srinivas and others
The Central Power Distribution company of A.P.Ltd.
R.SUBHASH REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
