Appeal disposed upon compromise. The court recorded that both parties and their counsel were present, identified themselves, and agreed to the terms of compromise, leading to the disposal of the appeal suit without a written order detailing the terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. SWAROOP REDDY
A.S.No.814 OF 2003
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is filed by the appellant-plaintiff assailing the decree and judgment dated 12.08.2002 in O.S.No.130 of 1999 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool.
2. Heard.
3. Both parties and their respective counsel are present. Both the parties identified by their respective counsel and the parties agreed for the terms of the compromise.
4. In the circumstances, the appeal suit is disposed of in terms of compromise within the scope of this Court.
P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.
8th September 2009 Rns
Appellant-Plaintiff
Respondent-Defendant
P. Swaroop Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
