Writ Appeal No. 315 of 1999 was dismissed because the appellant failed to appear on the hearing dates without filing any representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY
WRIT APPEAL NO : 315 of 1999
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 19.02.1999 IN WP NO.3325 OF 1999 on the file of the High Court.)
Between: Syed Azam S/O late Syed Aziz Aged 75 years, 2-2-22, Bagh Amberpet HYDERABAD
.....
APPELLANT
AND
The District Collector, Hyderabad district Hyderabad & 2 others
.....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant:MR.B.VENKATA SWAMY
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY
WRIT APPEAL No.315 of 1999
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble S ri Justice V.Eswaraiah)
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 10.09.2008, as none appeared for the appellant, it was directed to post the matter on 11.09.2008 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today when the matter is called, none appeared for the appellant, nor is there any representation on his behalf.
Hence, the writ appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No order as to costs.
_________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J_
G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J
Date: 11.09.2008 bss
Syed Azam S/O late Syed Aziz
The District Collector, Hyderabad district Hyderabad
2 others
V.ESWARAIAH
G.V.SEETHAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
