The High Court dismissed the writ appeal in absentia after finding that the appellants failed to appear on the hearing dates and offered no representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY
WRIT APPEAL NO : 175 of 1999
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 29.07.1998 in WP No.25932 of 1997 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
Elike Muthyalu & another
.....
APPELLANTS
AND Kode Veeranna & 7 others
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellants :MR.K.L.N.SWAMY
Counsel for the Respondents.: . Mr. G.DHARMA RAO The Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.ESWARAIAH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY
WRIT APPEAL No.175 of 1999
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble S ri Justice V.Eswaraiah)
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 01.09.2008, as none appeared for the appellants, it was directed to post the matter on 09.09.2008 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today when the matter is called, none appeared for the appellants, nor is there any representation on their behalf.
Hence, the writ appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No order as to costs.
_________________ V.ESWARAIAH, J_
_____________________ G.V.SEETHAPATHY, J_
Date: 09.09.2008 bss
Elike Muthyalu & another
Kode Veeranna & 7 others
V.ESWARAIAH
G.V.SEETHAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
