The Supreme Court disposed of Writ Petition No. 9957 of 2003, finding an interim order from May 2003 made further adjudication unnecessary. The respondents' right to proceed with pending enquiry regarding the vehicle was preserved.
Writ Petition disposed of contingent on prior interim order; respondents' enquiry rights preserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G. ROHINI
WRIT PETITION No. 9957 of 2003
Dated 18th July 2007
Between:
E.Madhunaiah, Sirpur Kagaznagar, Adilabad District.
………Petitioner
and
The Registering Authority Regional Transport Authority, Mancherial, Adilabad District and other.
………..Respondents.
HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE G. ROHINI
WRIT PETITION No. 9957 of 2003
ORDER:
In view of the interim order dated 20.5.2003 in WPMP No.12598 of 2003, no further adjudication is necessary.
The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. However, it is made clear that there shall not preclude the respondents to proceed with the enquiry, if any, pending in respect of the vehicle in question. No costs.
(G.ROHINI, J)
Dated: 18th July 2007 mrb
E. Madhunaiah
The Registering Authority Regional Transport Authority, Mancherial
G. ROHINI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
