The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared on the return date despite earlier direction to dismiss.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6735 OF 1997
Date: 05.02.2007
Between:
V.R.S. & Y.R.N. College, Chirala Prakasam District rep., by its Secretary & Correspondent.
… Petitioner.
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and four others.
… Respondents.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6735 OF 1997
ORDER:
Since none appeared for the petitioner on 31.01.2007, the matter was directed to be posted for dismissal. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, neither the petitioner’s counsel is present nor is there any representation on his behalf. The writ petition is therefore dismissed for nonprosecution.
____________________________ Date: 05.02.2007 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
MRKR
V.R.S. & Y.R.N. College, Chirala Prakasam District
The State of Andhra Pradesh and four others
Ramesh Ranganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
