Nadamala Krishna Reddy and 3 Others v. R.M.Apsrtc Hyd.and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner counsel stated that the writ petition had become infructuous. The court dismissed the writ petition accordingly without any costs.
Petitioner counsel stated that the writ petition had become infructuous. The court dismissed the writ petition accordingly without any costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION No. 6194 OF 197
Date: 05.02.2007
Nidamalla Krishna Reddy and three others. … Petitioners and
Regional Manager, APSRTC, Bhagyanagar Region, Hyderabad and two others.
… Respondents.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH
RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION No. 6194 OF 197
ORDER:
Sri J. Kanakaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner is represented that the writ petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
____________________________ Date: 05.02.2007 RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
MRKR
Nidamalla Krishna Reddy and three others
Regional Manager, APSRTC, Bhagyanagar Region, Hyderabad and two others
Ramesh Ranganathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court