G.v.Bhagyalakshmi v. the Dist.Educational Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The Writ Petition was dismissed by the High Court as infructuous since it had become so. No costs were awarded.
The Writ Petition was dismissed by the High Court as infructuous since it had become so. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.8892 of 2003
Dated:09.03.2006
Between:
G.V.Bhagyalakshmi, D/o.G.Chalapathi. AND The District Educational Officer and others.
..... PETITIONER
.....RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.8892 of 2003
ORDER:
Learned Counsel, Sri B.Shiva Shankar, representing the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Kesana Rama Koteswara Rao, submits that the matter has become infructuous.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
09.03.2006
vs
G.V. Bhagyalakshmi
The District Educational Officer
V.V. S Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court