G.Purushotham Rao v. Govt. Ap.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition as a time-barred cause of action, holding that due to the efflux of time, the matter could not be adjudicated. No costs were awarded.
The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition as a time-barred cause of action, holding that due to the efflux of time, the matter could not be adjudicated. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.15901 of 1996
Dated:12.12.2006
Between 1.G.Purushottam Rao and others.
…..Petitioners
and
1.Govt A.P. rep., by its Secretary Law Department and others.
…Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.15901 of 1996
ORDER:
Due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
_________ 12-12-2006
rkk
Purushottam Rao and others
Government of A.P. and others
C.V. Ramulju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court