The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous following the counsel's statement to the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
On Thursday, the fifteenth day of September
Two thousand and five.
W.P. No.3648 of 2005
N.G.K.S.V.K.Prasad
……….Petitioner.
And
The Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Excise.II) Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others.
………Respondents.
O R D E R:
The learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the cause in present writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Justice K.C.BHANU.
15th September 2005.
BCS
N.G.K.S.V.K.Prasad
The Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Excise.II) Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh
K.C. BHANU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
