The Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous upon hearing counsel who stated the cause of action had become infructuous. No costs were awarded.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
On Thursday, the fifteenth day of September
Two thousand and five.
W.P. No.3645 of 2005
N. Manohar Chowdary, Licencee, M/s Murali
Wines, Pakala village, Chittoor Dt.
……….Petitioner.
And
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue (Excise.II) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, represented by its Special Chief Secretary to Government and others.
………Respondents.
O R D E R:
The learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the cause in present writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Justice K.C.BHANU.
15th September 2005.
BCS
N. Manohar Chowdary
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
K.C. Bhanu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
