Annapurna Theatre (Delux) Palasa, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition regarding cinema admission rates became infructuous; the High Court dismissed the petition as such.
What did the court decide?
none
A writ petition regarding cinema admission rates became infructuous; the High Court dismissed the petition as such.
none
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION NO : 21184 of 2001
Between:
Annapurna Theatre (Delux) Palasa,
Rep by its Prop Penta Narasimha Muthy, S/o Rajulu, R/o Palasa, Srikakulam District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 Government of Andhra Pradesh,
Rep by its Secretary Home(General
Administration),Department Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The Joint Collector, Srikakulam
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the G.O.Ms.No.538 Home-D (Gen.A) Department dt:11.7.1994 and G.O.Ms.No.218 Home (Gen.A) Department dt: 14.7.1995 in so far as fixing the maximum rate of admission in respect of lowest class, is beyond the slope of the provisions of A.P.Cinemas (Regulations) Act 1955 and as such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner :MR.K.VENKATARAO Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following :
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.K.Venkata Rao, submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
21-06-2005
vs
To
1 The Secretary,
Home(General Administration),Department,
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
3 Two CCs to G.P.for Home, High Court buildings,
High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
Annapurna Theatre (Delux) Palasa and Penta Narasimha Muthy
Government of Andhra Pradesh
The Joint Collector, Srikakulam
V.V.S.RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court